Boycotts, Shmoycotts – who are the real losers?

Boycotts, Shmoycotts – who are the real losers?

25/5/2017 / Rolene Marks

The BDS (Boycott, Divestment and sanctions) movement sure is noisy. While lacking cerebral substance, they understand the veracity of symbolism and language that is provocative, emotive and emotional. They understand that gratuitous use of the word Apartheid is guaranteed to get an emotional reaction from people.
I use the word gratuitous intentionally because BDS have no respect or understanding of the crime that was Apartheid and the trauma of its victims. To them it is simply evocative, sexy packaging that can be used to market their agenda and make it appealing to the masses who maintain they are concerned about human rights. If you wrap up hatred and sell it in an emotional package, then surely you must be on the side of good, right?
Wrong. There is a more nefarious agenda at play here and it is time to expose it.

A wolfish agenda in sheep’s clothing
Why is BDS so hell-bent on the accusation of Apartheid?
The motivation is simple. They want to paint Israel with the same colours as that of Apartheid South Africa to undermine Israel’s legitimacy in the hope that global opprobrium will bring it down like the walls of Jericho.  It’s not going to happen because Israel is not Apartheid South Africa, like BDS advocates want people to believe. BDS would have you believe that boycotts and sanctions contributed to the downfall of Apartheid in South Africa and that the same kind of well strategized campaign can do the same to change Israeli policies. There are very clear differences – in Apartheid South Africa, the minority white population had dominion over the majority black population and eventually, it was the citizens of the country who spoke out overwhelmingly in a referendum that the time had long passed to do away with this heinous regime. The situation between Israelis and Palestinians is far more complicated. Rather than a loveless marriage, the parties prefer an amicably divorce in best enjoying their national aspirations. It is extremely presumptuous for South Africans to impose their “one-solution-fits-all” to one of the most complex political conflicts in modern history.

Destruction rather than Construction
Did boycotts and sanctions contribute to the fall of Apartheid?
The idea of boycotts and sanctions was debated in the 1960’s but only really gained traction in the 1980’s. In November 1962, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 1761, a non-binding resolution establishing the United Nations Special Committee against Apartheid and called for imposing economic and other sanctions on South Africa. All Western nations were unhappy with the call for sanctions and as a result boycotted the committee. Fast forward to the 1980’s and the height of the regime and it can be said that while sanctions did effect the economy, the credit for ending Apartheid once and for all was the sterling efforts of Nelson Mandela and FW de Klerk who took great – sometimes unpopular risks – to ensure a better future for South Africans based of the democratic principles of equality and justice for all.
In South Africa, nobody ever questioned the country’s right to exist as a nation state which is precisely BDS’s endgame. It says so openly and unashamedly – “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”. This means that Israel is dealing with a malevolent movement that aims – contrary to the democratic principles that was the GPS in the South African process –  to destroy of one of the main players, namely – Israel.

Who stands to lose the most?
It is easy for activists on both sides to play armchair politicians but there are lives at stake and for the most part, Palestinians have more to lose. With an Israeli economy that is booming, the impact of boycotts on the lives on Israelis is minimal – mostly psychological. For Palestinians on the other hand, boycotts are likely to affect their livelihoods, such as in the current campaign on Twitter in South Africa to boycott KFC. Why, because there is a branch of KFC in Bethlehem in the Palestinian Authority and the only one in the whole region, that is partly owned by an Israeli company – a very small stake –  in partnership with Palestinians to help drive the Palestinian economy. Should the boycott be successful – who are the beneficiaries and who are the losers. The losers invariably are the Palestinians while the beneficiaries are the South African armchair politicians, flexing their finger muscles with Twitter.
Does BDS really care that their strategies may affect the very people they purport to help?
Of course not; nothing must get in the way of destroying Israel. Palestinian lives are the sacrificial lambs in a BDS campaign that is about demolishing bridges rather than building bridges. See how esteemed human rights Palestinian activist explains how the BDS movement and their boycott campaigns affects ordinary Palestinians in this video clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WaZGq6fyWo

If BDS truly cared about the lives of Palestinians, they would champion for a second Singapore or Start-Up Nation like their neighbour than promote murderous and genocidal incitement. Peace will be built from the ground up. It will start with spirited not dispirited people –  individuals and communities, business people and investors. Boycotts create barriers and discourages positive discourse. While the situation in the Middle East is a challenge, let us promote positive tracks of building and promoting commerce that will create a thriving economy rather than the destructive path of boycotts! For those South Africans with an irresistible urge to boycott, I suggest –  boycott the boycotters!

IsraelSouth AfricaBDSPalestinian AuthorityWest BankPalestineBoycot
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on Twitter